Legal Opinion
Vigil v. Coloplast Corp.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 8, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01851Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BELINDA VIGIL, et al., Case No.: 3:19-cv-01851-GPC-BGS Plaintiffs, 12 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO v. 13 AMEND THE SHORT FORM COLOPLAST CORP., COMPLAINT. 14 Defendant. 15 ECF No. 43. 16 17 Plaintiffs Belinda Vigil and her husband, Juan Vigil, seek leave from the Court to 18 amend their short form complaint to include the Aris-Transobturator Sling System (the 19 “Aris Sling”) as a product at issue. Defendant Coloplast Corporation opposes the 20 amendment. Plaintiffs’ motion thus presents two questions for the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Eminence Capital, Llc, and Jay Spechler v. Aspeon, Inc. Richard P. StackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Dcd Programs, Ltd. v. Michael W. Leighton, Hill, Farrer & BurrillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Corinthian CollegesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Morongo Band of Mission Indians, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant/appellant v. Frank Rose Clive "Sonny" Miller, Defendants-Counter-Plaintiffs/appelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Jack Allen v. City of Beverly HillsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.