Legal Opinion
Carder Buick-Olds Co. v. Reynolds & Reynolds, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 14, 2002No. C.A. Case No. 19114, T.C. Case No. 98-3338PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Brogan, Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Carder Buick-Olds (“Carder”) is an automobile dealership located in Searcy, Arkansas. From 1980 to 1990, Carder used a computer system purchased from Reynolds & Reynolds (“Reynolds”). In 1990, Carder replaced this system with one from Convergent Dealership Systems. At the time Carder purchased the Convergent system, it signed a sales and license agreement that included a contract for maintenance and support of the system. Sometime after 1990, COIN Dealership Systems bought out Convergent and assumed responsibility for the maintenance and support of all…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- AAAA Enterprises, Inc. v. River Place Community Urban Redevelopment Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Kelly v. Medical Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cantlin v. Smythe Cramer Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
- Ritt v. Billy Blanks EnterprisesOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Schmitz v. Natl. Collegiate Athletic Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Walker v. Firelands Community HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Standard Petroleum Co. v. Faugno Acquisition, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.