Legal Opinion

Bradley v. Niemann

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 3, 1950PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The car driven by one plaintiff in which the other was riding as a passenger was ran into from the rear by a car driven by the defendant. Personal injuries and property damage were claimed. The plaintiffs appealed from the denial of their motions to set aside the defendant’s verdicts and from the judgments. They were represented on appeal by an attorney other than the one who tried the case.

The jury reasonably could have found that both cars were proceeding slowly westerly on the Boston Post Road in Stamford on October 7, 1945, about 9 p. m. The weather was clear and the pavement dry. A car…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Perry v. Simpson Waterproof Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1873
  2. Beauton v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  3. McMahon v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1950
  4. Moulin v. BergeronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jacobs v. GoodspeedSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Dumond v. DenehySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
  3. Kelly v. BlissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  4. Flynn v. RaccuiaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Dulski v. AppelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API