Legal Opinion
Dulski v. Appel
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 28, 1976PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBogdanski, J.
The plaintiff, Stanley Dulski, brought this action against the defendants, Jay Appel and Irving Appel, seeking damages for personal injuries allegedly caused by the negligence of Jay Appel in the operation of an automobile owned by his father, Irving Appel. The jury returned a general verdict in favor of the defendants. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment rendered and has assigned error in the court’s rulings on evidence, in its refusal to charge as requested, and in its refusal to set aside the verdict.
The plaintiff alleged that “[o]n October 15, 1968, at 3:00 p.m. in Stamford on a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Desmarais v. PintoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Hally v. Hospital of St. RaphaelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Petrizzo v. Commercial Contractors CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Hanauer v. CosciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- Kelly v. BlissSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frankovitch v. BurtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- State v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Kosko v. KohlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Townsend v. AppelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Vetre v. KeeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.