Legal Opinion

Durden v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 19, 1980No. 3-978A234PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Defendant-appellant Donald Durden was convicted in a jury trial of first-degree burglary for which he was sentenced for a period of not less than ten nor more than twenty years. His appeal raises these questions:(1) whether the trial court erred in giving supplemental instructions;(2) whether the trial court erred in not granting additional argument on the supplemental instructions;(3) whether the supplemental instruction on accomplice liability was an improper amendment to the Information; and(4) whether there was sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction.

The circumstances…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Brannum v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Jameison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Brunaugh v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  5. State v. LindenWashington Supreme Court · 1932

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Foster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Hero v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Graves v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Durden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Michael Freed v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API