Legal Opinion

Conley v. Central Square School District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied the motion of defendant Town of Constantia (Town) to renew its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint against it. The Town failed to establish that its submissions in support of its motion to renew could not have readily and with due diligence been made part of the original motion (see, Lindsay v Funtime, Inc. [appeal No. 2], 184 AD2d 1036). The testimony obtained in the depositions held after the denial of the Town’s original motion added nothing material to the issues the Town had raised in that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lindsay v. Funtime, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. Doe v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Monroe Dewey Partners v. MDR Development, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blazynski v. A. Gareleck & Sons, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Carroway Luxury Homes, LLC v. Integra Supply Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. Fowler v. St. Luke's Memorial Hospital CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API