Legal Opinion

Shipman v. National Passenger Railroad Corporation (Amtrak)

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 20, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0384Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA D’RAYFIELD KARY-KHAME SHIPMAN, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 14-384 (CKK) NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK), et al., Defendants MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER (July 20, 2015) Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s [59] “Response Motion,” in which Plaintiff requests that the Court recuse itself because of “a serious conflict of interest.” Pl.’s Mot. at 1. Plaintiff argues that the Court should disqualify itself and reassign this matter to a new judge for further proceedings. Specifically, Plaintiff argues that a conflict…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Loving Spirit Foundation Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  3. Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  4. Middlebrooks v. St. Coletta of Greater Washington, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  5. Ramos v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API