Georgia Casualty & Surety Co. v. Speller
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
1. Industrial blindness and deafness, that is, a loss of use of the member which renders it too ineffective for use for industrial purposes, is for workmen’s compensation purposes to be considered as a total loss of use of the eye or ear. Shipman v. Employers Mut. Liab. Ins. Co., 105 Ga. App. 487, 493 (125 SE2d 72); Davis v. Cobb County, 106 Ga. App. 336 (lb) (126 SE2d 710).
2. The appellant urges that this case is controlled by Ga. Cas. &c. Co. v. Wesby, 119 Ga. App. 545 (168 SS2d 191), and Dunn v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co., 81 Ga. App. 283 (58 SE2d 245), and that we must as a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shipman v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- General Motors Corporation v. HargisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. BrockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
- Davis v. Cobb CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Dunn v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lee Connell Construction Company v. SwannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- LEE CONNELL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. SwannCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
- Barry v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Barry v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Cecil Ray Arnold v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.