Legal Opinion

Ciampi v. Commissioner of Correction

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 15, 2008PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

The plaintiff, Dennis A. Ciampi, commenced an action in the nature of certiorari, G. L. c. 249, § 4, against the defendants challenging the validity of the Department of Correction’s (department’s) regulations and substance abuse policy that allow it to withdraw funds from a prisoner’s savings and personal account to satisfy a restitution sanction in a disciplinary action. In his complaint he alleged, inter alla, that the seizure of his account violated his State and Federal constitutional rights, and he sought declaratory relief under G. L. c. 231A and damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000).…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Diatchenko v. District Attorney for the Suffolk District Commonwealth v. RoberioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
  2. Taylor v. Eastern Connection Operating, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  3. Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
  4. Doucette v. Massachusetts Parole BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
  5. Ivey v. Commissioner of CorrectionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API