Legal Opinion
Frederick G. Jackson v. Matthew J. Frank, 1
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 6, 2003No. 02-1979PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
When Frederick Jackson told the detective questioning him that he wanted a lawyer “right now,” the detective responded that he could not accommodate Jackson’s request and that he would have to end the interview. The detective’s statement to Jackson was, at the very least, misleading: under Wisconsin law public defenders are available to suspects in custody on an emergency basis. After his conversation with the detective, Jackson waived his Miranda rights and confessed. He later moved to suppress his confession, arguing that his waiver was not voluntary due to the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Lockyer v. AndradeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- Pole v. RandolphCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Kevin A. Conner v. Daniel McBride SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
- Watson v. AnglinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Allen v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Todd Saxon v. Jacqueline LashbrookCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.