Legal Opinion

State v. Sweeney

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 20, 1986No. 7395-1-IIPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, J.

—William Sweeney appeals his conviction for indecent liberties. On appeal, we are asked to decide three issues: (1) whether testimony of a psychologist, which related to behavior patterns of children who had been sexually abused by their fathers, constituted an impermissible comment on Sweeney's guilt; (2) whether the denial of Sweeney's motion for continuance deprived him of his Sixth Amendment rights to confrontation and effective assistance of counsel; and (3) whether the deposition of a State's witness was improperly admitted because the State failed to establish that the witness was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. MauleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  2. State v. KimHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  4. State v. GoddardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  5. State v. RatzlaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. DeSantiagoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. DeSantiagoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. PalomoWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. AaronCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API