State v. Sweeney
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, J.
—William Sweeney appeals his conviction for indecent liberties. On appeal, we are asked to decide three issues: (1) whether testimony of a psychologist, which related to behavior patterns of children who had been sexually abused by their fathers, constituted an impermissible comment on Sweeney's guilt; (2) whether the denial of Sweeney's motion for continuance deprived him of his Sixth Amendment rights to confrontation and effective assistance of counsel; and (3) whether the deposition of a State's witness was improperly admitted because the State failed to establish that the witness was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. MauleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- State v. KimHawaii Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
- State v. GoddardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- State v. RatzlaffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. DeSantiagoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. DeSantiagoWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. PalomoWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. AaronCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- State v. RiveraCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.