Legal Opinion

In Re Hague

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 27, 1929PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The record in this case has not been submitted to me. My decision in Ex parte Hague, 104 N.J. Eq. 31; 144 Atl. Rep. 546, of which the present case is a sequence, is dispositive as to this court of the matters in controversy herein other than the questions — (1) whether joint resolution No. 13, adopted by the legislature of the year 1928 had any vitality after the final adjournment of said body other than to enable the committee appointed thereunder to report; (2) whether the legislature of the year 1929 was authorized to amend and supplement the aforesaid resolution; (3) whether the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Kilbourn v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  4. Anderson v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  5. McGrain v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Scudder v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Carlton v. GrimesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  3. People Ex Rel. Hastings v. HofstadterNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. State Ex Rel. Hamblen v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. State Ex Rel. Robinson v. FluentWashington Supreme Court · 1948

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API