Legal Opinion

Kuk v. Nalley

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 7, 2007No. S-12024PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

A statute provides that when a defendant leaves the state her absence is not part of a limitations period. Does this statute apply when she is temporarily out of the state but amenable to service of process? We answer "no" because our case law establishes that the absence contemplated by the statute must obstruct or prevent a suit. This interpretation serves the policy of limitations statutes by providing a definite time and avoiding needless uncertainty.

Facts and Proceedings

On November 17, 2002, motor vehicles driven by Janet Nalley and Thomas Kuk collided. Thomas,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Phillips v. Anchor Hocking Glass CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Couts v. RoseOhio Supreme Court · 1950

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marshall Garber v. Heriberto Menendez, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. Kennedy v. W. Res. Senior CareOhio Supreme Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API