Legal Opinion
Young v. Garrett
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided September 14, 1943No. Civil Action Nos. 163, 164PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
The above causes have been consolidated for hearing and disposition of the motions to dismiss which are bottomed upon the contention that certain persons and corporations are indispensable parties plaintiff in both causes, and that if such persons and corporations are made parties plaintiff there will not be the requisite diversity of citizenship to support the jurisdiction of the court, that being the only alleged ground of jurisdiction.
Counsel for the defendants have filed affidavits in support of their motions, and counsel for the plaintiffs have likewise filed…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State of Washington v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- California v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Franz v. BuderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Division 525, Order of Ry. Conductors of America v. GormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Momand v. Twentieth-Century Fox Film CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boris v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1957
- Young v. Same.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947
- Charles Keeshin, Inc. v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of RogersDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1961
- Campbell v. Pacific Fruit Express CompanyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1957
- E. H. Crump & Co. v. GatewoodDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.