Legal Opinion

E. H. Crump & Co. v. Gatewood

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided September 24, 1980No. LR-C-80-298PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROY, District Judge.

The instant cause came on for a hearing before the Court on the various motions pending. The Court has agreed to reach the threshold issue of whether an indispensable party is absent so that there may be a determination of whether jurisdiction in this Court will be ousted.

As to the parties, E. H. Crump & Company, Inc., is a Delaware corporation (“Crump-Delaware”). E. H. Crump Companies, Inc., is a Tennessee corporation (“Crump-Tennessee”). E. H. Crump of Arkansas, Inc., is an Arkansas corporation (“Crump-Arkansas”). Baldwin, Meadors & Associates, Inc., is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Lang v. Colonial Pipeline CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Dunn v. Phoenix Village, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1963
  4. Credit Bureau Management Company v. HuieDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1966
  5. Barnett v. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ed Freeman and Wife Sharon Freeman, Cross-Appellants v. Northwest Acceptance Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  2. Johnson & Johnson v. Coopervision, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API