E. H. Crump & Co. v. Gatewood
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROY, District Judge.
The instant cause came on for a hearing before the Court on the various motions pending. The Court has agreed to reach the threshold issue of whether an indispensable party is absent so that there may be a determination of whether jurisdiction in this Court will be ousted.
As to the parties, E. H. Crump & Company, Inc., is a Delaware corporation (“Crump-Delaware”). E. H. Crump Companies, Inc., is a Tennessee corporation (“Crump-Tennessee”). E. H. Crump of Arkansas, Inc., is an Arkansas corporation (“Crump-Arkansas”). Baldwin, Meadors & Associates, Inc., is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Lang v. Colonial Pipeline CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Dunn v. Phoenix Village, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1963
- Credit Bureau Management Company v. HuieDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1966
- Barnett v. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corp.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ed Freeman and Wife Sharon Freeman, Cross-Appellants v. Northwest Acceptance Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Johnson & Johnson v. Coopervision, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989