Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Wrenn

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided March 1, 1935No. 5499PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BREWSTER, District Judge.

This action is brought by the receiver of the Boston-Continental National Bank to enforce the liability imposed by law upon stockholders in national banks. The action was tried without jury.

The controlling facts are as follows: In December, 1930, the Continental National Bank (hereinafter referred to as the Continental) consolidated with the Boston National Bank. After the consolidation, the consolidated banks under the name of “Boston-Continental National Bank” carried on the banking business under the charter and by-laws of the Boston National Bank. According to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. National Bank v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Keyser v. HitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Pauly v. State Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Williams v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. Bowden v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1883

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Deitrick v. WrennCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API