Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Shaw
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
After a careful review of the evidence, this court finds that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(1), (3), (4) and (6), DR 7-101 (A)(3), and DR 9-102(A) and (B) of the Code of Professional Responsibility. Accordingly, we concur in the recommendation of the board of commissioners.
Therefore, it is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.
Judgment accordingly.
Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. LawrenceOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Dayton Bar Ass'n v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Bar Ass'n v. KlessOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Disciplinary Counsel v. LawrenceOhio Supreme Court · 1995