People v. . Fitch
New York Court of Appeals
Cross-appeals from order of the General Term of the 'Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made May 14, 1895, and from the judgment entered thereon, which modified and affirmed as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court, and directed the issuance of a peremptory mandamus. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Cross-appeals from order of the General Term of the 'Supreme Court in the third judicial department, made May 14, 1895, and from the judgment entered thereon, which modified and affirmed as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict directed by the court, and directed the issuance of a peremptory mandamus. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The acts, chapter 126, Laws 1890, and chapter 565, Laws 1893, are in pari materia, and are, therefore, to be read and ■construed together as if they constituted part of the same ■statute and were enacted at the…
1Opinion of the CourtBartlett, J.
In 1890 the legislature passed an act for the care of the pauper and indigent insane in the counties of this state, except Hew York, Kings and Monroe counties, and provided that the excepted counties might avail themselves of the provisions of the act (Chapter 126, Laws of 1890). The act also states that after certain accommodations were provided and steps taken the pauper and indigent insane should be regarded and known as the wards of the state, and be wholly supported by the state; all incidental expenses rendered necessary by the act are also made a charge upon the state.
In 1893 the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Providence Bank v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Smith v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Waller v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 1838
- Genet v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- People Ex Rel. Onondaga County Savings Bank v. ButlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matter of BryantNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- State v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 1898
- Smith v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1896
- In re Supplementary Proceedings for the Collection of a Tax of the Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co.New York Supreme Court · 1904
- White v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1920