Legal Opinion

Smith v. City of Buffalo

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by Junius S. Smith against the city of Buffalo to recover interest on certain claims against defendant. Judgment for plaintiff.

1Opinion of the Court

SPRING, J!

The plaintiff brings Ms action to recover interest, which he asserts accrued on certain claims he held against the city of Buffalo. Thomas Dark & Sons, in pursuance of contracts with the city, performed work in 1888 and 1889 in repairing its sewers. The accounts for the work in each instance were properly audited, and were assigned to the plaintiff by the contractors. Most of these claims were arranged by the issuance of warrants to the plaintiff, although a few were paid directly by the law department of the city. The times intervening the auditing of the accounts and their payment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re the Trustees of the New York & Brooklyn Bridge to Acquire Lands of ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  2. Cutter v. . the Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of Executors of HodgmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Tillotson v. PrestonNew York Supreme Court · 1808
  5. Pacific Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Crane v. . CraigNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Leighton v. Leighton Lea Ass' nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API