Legal Opinion
Finnerty v. Stiefel Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided October 16, 2012No. Case No. 09-21871-CIVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING TAXATION OF COSTS FOR ELECTRONIC DATABASE
JAMES LAWRENCE KING, District Judge.
THIS MATTER comes before the Court upon Greenspoon Marder P.A.’s Bill of Costs (DE # 547), filed August 8, 2012, and Supplement to Its Request to Recover Costs Related to the Creation and Use of an Electronic Database Under 28 U.S.C. 1920(4) (DE #570), filed September 10, 2012. Therein, Greenspoon Marder, an assignee of Plaintiffs former counsel, recites $8,017.51 in costs that Defendant agreed to be taxed and also argues that it should be permitted to tax Defendants for the $73,764.82 related to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Race Tires America, Inc. v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- John F. Loughan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company, John F. Loughan, Cross-Appellee v. Firestone Tire and Rubber Company, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- CBT FLINT PARTNERS, LLC v. Return Path, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Marine Depot International, Inc. v. James River Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2020
- Nail v. ShippDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2020
- Tsavaris v. Savannah Law School, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2021