Legal Opinion

Boydson v. Goodrich

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1882PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Mecosta. [Replevin. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Grates, O. J.

The plaintiff prosecuted replevin for a pair of horses, a wagon and harness, and the property was taken on the writ and delivered to him. All the material facts were expressly agreed upon and the value of the property with interest from the time of caption on the process was admitted to be • $433. The defendant announced his waiver of a return and the court directed a verdict in his favor for that amount.

The leading circumstances are as follows:

In May, 1874, the plaintiff and one Benjamin F. Warren were residents of the State of Indiana, of which State the former has continued to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Montgomery v. WightMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Greenville National Bank v. Evans-Snyder-Buel Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. Shapard v. HynesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  3. Turnbull v. ColeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1921
  4. Metro Plan, Inc. v. Kotcher-Turner, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Adams v. FellersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API