Legal Opinion

AAA Nevada Insurance v. Buenaventura

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 15, 2016No. 13-17664UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ***

• Plaintiff-Appellant AAA appeals the district court’s Federal Rule of Civil Proce dure 60(b) ruling vacating the court’s prior order granting summary judgment in favor of AAA. The earlier order had concluded that AAA had not acted in bad faith by failing to settle a wrongful death claim. We find that we have appellate jurisdiction, and we reverse.

Orders under Rule 60(b) vacating judgments are ordinarily considered interlocutory and not appealable. Ballard v. Baldridge, 209 F.3d 1160, 1161 (9th Cir.2000); Resnik v. La Paz Guest Ranch, 289 F.2d 814, 817 (9th Cir.1961). Such…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Harry Franklin v. State of Oregon, State Welfare DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  4. Phillips v. NegleySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Edward A. Ashford v. Charles Steuart, Don Erby, Ray Beaman, Steve Stedfelt, and Maynard RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Palmer v. MilnorDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API