Legal Opinion

Roco v. Comm'r

United States Tax Court

Decided September 11, 2003No. 8470-01PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Petitioner (P) sued the New York University Medical Center (NYUMC) in a qui tam action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. secs. 3729-3733 (2000). NYUMC agreed to pay $ 15,500,000 to the United States to settle the case.

Read the full summary

Petitioner (P) sued the New York University Medical Center (NYUMC) in a qui tam action under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. secs. 3729-3733 (2000). NYUMC agreed to pay $ 15,500,000 to the United States to settle the case. The United States paid $ 1,568,087 of the settlement proceeds to P in 1997. The parties dispute whether the $ 1,568,087 qui tam payment is includable in P's gross income for 1997. Held: The $ 1,568,087 payment is includable in P's gross income for 1997. Held , further, P is liable for the accuracy- related penalty under sec. 6662(a), I.R.C., for 1997.

1Opinion of the Court

Colvin, Judge:

Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s 1997 Federal income tax of $610,446 and an accuracy-related penalty under section 6662(a) of $122,093.

Petitioner sued the New York University Medical Center (nyumc) in a qui tam1 action under the False Claims Act (FCA), 31 U.S.C. secs. 3729-3733 (2000). In the qui tam action, petitioner claimed that NYUMC had submitted false information to the United States which resulted in a substantial overpayment of Federal funds to NYUMC. nyumc agreed to pay $15,500,000 to the United States in settlement of the case. The United States paid…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Doyle v. Mitchell Brothers Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. United States v. Kirby Lumber CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Campbell v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Campbell v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2010
  3. Stockton v. State Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Alderson v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2010
  5. Patrick v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API