Legal Opinion
Flores v. Pac. Island Transp. Lines
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 1967No. Civ. No. 30728PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtFourt, J.
This action was instituted by longshoreman Arthur Flores (hereinafter called Flores) against ship’s owner Thor-Dahl A/S (hereinafter called Thor-Dahl) for damages for personal injuries suffered when, in the course of his employment by Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Company (hereinafter called Crescent), Flores was engaged in unloading the vessel Thorsisle. Thor-Dahl filed a cross-complaint for indemnity against Crescent and the jury returned a verdict of $78,850 in favor of Flores but denied indemnity to ThorDahl; judgment was entered accordingly. Because the accident was sustained by a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Crumady v. the Joachim Hendrik FisserSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- R. H. Manning v. M/v "Sea Road", Her Engines, Etc., and Sea Road Shipping Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969