Legal Opinion

People v. Jackson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 2002No. Docket 120300PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

This case presents the question whether the trial court properly denied the prosecutor’s request for a continuance where a subpoenaed witness failed to appear on the date set for trial. We hold that the trial court abused its discretion in denying a continuance in the circumstances presented in this case. We thus reverse the judgments of the Court of Appeals and the trial court and remand the case to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL POSTURE

Defendant was charged with two counts of armed robbery, MCL 750.529, and one count…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Spalding v. SpaldingMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  2. People v. Charles O. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. HoaglinMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  4. People v. BurbyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  5. McMillan v. LarnedMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Joshua Tackett v. Tony TrierweilerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. People v. YostMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. People v. GraceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Douglas Lancaster v. Cosmopolitan Homes IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. People of Michigan v. Anthony Gayl LakeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API