Legal Opinion

Benetatos v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 14, 2015No. B253491PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, Acting P. J.

INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs and appellants Jack Benetatos and his son Nick Benetatos (plaintiffs) own and operate Tam’s Burgers No. 6 (Tam’s), a fast-food restaurant in Los Angeles. They appeal from the trial court’s denial of their petition for writ of mandate that sought to overturn defendant and respondent City of Los Angeles’s (City) determination that plaintiffs operated Tam’s in a manner that constituted a nuisance and the City’s imposition of conditions on the continued operation of Tam’s. Plaintiffs argue that the de novo standard of review applies and that the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. JKH Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Interstate Brands v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Goat Hill Tavern v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clary v. City of Crescent CityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. JMS Air Conditioning & Appliance Serv., Inc. v. Santa Monica Cmty. Coll. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. City of Fontana v. Cal. Dep't of Tax & Fee Admin., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  4. Alpha Nu Assn. of Theta XI v. University of So. Cal.California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. City of Fontana v. Cal. Dep't of Tax & Fee Admin., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API