Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Bugge v. Martin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1951No. 31764PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, J.

The relator has invoked the original jurisdiction of this court pursuant to Const. Art. IV, § 4, requesting a writ of mandamus commanding the state finance committee, comprised of the governor, the state auditor, and the state treasurer, to issue and sell bonds authorized by chapter 121 of the Laws of 1951.

The respondents urge that the bonds should not be issued for the reason that the act authorizing their issuance is unconstitutional in that its title is defective because it does not adequately express the subject of the act and contains more than one subject; that the act undertakes to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Gruen v. State Tax CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State Ex Rel. Washington Toll Bridge Authority v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Morrow v. HennefordWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Shelton Hotel Co., Inc. v. BatesWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State ex rel. Reed v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Washington State Finance Committee v. MartinWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Roehl v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Brown v. OwenWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Brown v. OwenWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State Ex Rel. Toll Bridge Auth. v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1962

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API