Legal Opinion
Central Bank Denver, N.A. v. Mehaffy, Rider, Windholz & Wilson
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 22, 1993No. 92CA0736PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge RULAND.
Plaintiff, Central Bank Denver (Bank), appeals from the dismissal of its claims against the law firms of Mehaffy, Rider, Windholz & Wilson and O’Connor & Hannan, its claims against individual attorneys John R. Mehaffy, James A. Windholz, and Arnold R. Kap-lan, and its claims against James A. Win-dholz, P.C. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.
As pertinent here, the record on appeal consists of the Bank’s complaint, motions to dismiss by defendants together with supporting and opposing briefs as well as three affidavits and copies of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Onita Pacific Corp. v. Trustees of BronsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- Keller v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Molecular Technology Corp. v. ValentineCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- First National Bank in Lamar v. CollinsColorado Court of Appeals · 1980
- Western Cities Broadcasting, Inc. v. SchuellerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Mehaffy, Rider, Windholz & Wilson v. Central Bank Denver, N.A.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Holmes v. YoungColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- First Interstate Bank of Denver, N.A. v. BerenbaumColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
- State College Area School District v. Royal Bank of CanadaDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Berger v. Dixon & Snow, P.C.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.