Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Young
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided June 16, 1994No. 93CA0129PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge DAVIDSON.
In this action to recover partnership assets, plaintiff, William C. Holmes, appeals from the judgment entered in favor of defendant, Richard E. Young.' We affirm.
Plaintiff was a limited partner in South of Second Associates (South of Second), a Colorado limited partnership formed in 1972. Ketchum. Konkel. Barrett. Nickel. Austin, Inc. (KKBNA), was the general partner; in addition to plaintiff, Richard W. and Robert E. Eckels were the limited partners. South of Second was to engage in the business of developing or disposing of real property which it acquired.
South of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Diduck v. Kaszycki & Sons Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Halberstam v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
- Moses v. Diocese of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Destefano v. GrabrianSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- S & K Sales Co. v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Alleco Inc. v. Harry & Jeanette Weinberg Foundation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Chem-Age Industries, Inc. v. GloverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Witzman v. Lehrman, Lehrman & FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Future Group, II v. NationsbankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- GCM, Inc. v. Kentucky Central Life InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.