Legal Opinion

Illarramendi v. United States

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided February 11, 2020No. 3:16-cv-01853Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT FRANCISCO ILLARRAMENDI, Petitioner, v. No. 3:16-cv-1853 (SRU) UNITED STATES, Respondent. RULING AND ORDER ON MOTION TO VACATE, CORRECT OR SET ASIDE SENTENCE Francisco Illarramendi, currently imprisoned at Federal Correctional Institution Fairton in Fairton, New Jersey, filed the instant motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence (“habeas petition”), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Illarramendi principally argues that his conviction and sentence should be vacated because: (1) a pre-trial temporary restraining order entered by…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API