Legal Opinion

Friedemann v. Kirk

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 21, 2000No. 2CA-CV99-0176PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FLÓREZ, Judge.

¶ 1 In this quiet title action, appellant Bruce Friedemann challenges the trial court’s order vacating the judgment entered in his favor against Beatrice Castillo and appellee James Kirk, the Pima County Treasurer. Friedemann contends the trial court erred in granting the Treasurer’s motion to vacate the entry of default judgment because Castillo’s right to redeem the property tax lien was already foreclosed at the time the Treasurer accepted her redemption payment. We agree and reverse.

¶ 2 The material facts are undisputed. In 1997, Friedemann took an assignment of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mercy Healthcare Arizona, Inc. v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Do by Minker v. Farmers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. Mason v. CansinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Roe v. Roosevelt Water Conservation DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Yarbrough v. Montoya-PaezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Daystar Investments, L.L.C. v. Maricopa County TreasurerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  3. LEVERAGED LAND CO., LLC v. HodgesArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Searle v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
  5. Umali v. DhananiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API