Legal Opinion

Britt Tech Corporation v. L & a PRODUCTS, INC.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided November 7, 1963No. 4-63-Civ-176PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEVITT, Chief Judge.

In this action for patent infringement, unfair competition, false marking in advertising and anti-trust violation, plaintiff moves for discovery and production of documents under Rule 34, F.R.Civ.P.

The issue for decision now is whether defendants should be required to produce and permit plaintiff to inspect and copy defendants’ patent application, No. 245123 dated December 17, 1962 filed in the United States Patent Office, and whether defendants should be required to produce and permit plaintiff to inspect and copy cost comparison figures of defendants for its L & A washer…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Karlsson v. WolfsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1956

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
  2. L & a Products, Inc., and James F. Lindsay v. Britt Tech Corporation, Oren B. Harmes, John H. Threlkeld and Donald A. DealCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
  3. Struthers Scientific & International Corp. v. General Foods Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1968
  4. Carrier Manufacturing Co. v. Rex Chainbelt, Inc.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968
  5. Ideal Toy Corp. v. Tyco Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API