Legal Opinion

Corey

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 20, 1925PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

This is a petition to establish the truth of exceptions. The petition is not verified by affidavit. The jurat annexed shows that it was acknowledged as the free act and deed of the petitioner. That is not verification by affidavit. It is manifest from the facts disclosed by the petitioner at the bar that there was no compliance with the requirement of Rule 6 of the Rules for the Regulation of Practice before the Full Court, that the petitioner “shall, before filing his petition, give notice thereof to the adverse party, by delivering a copy thereof to him or his attorney of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. ThorndikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. John Henry Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  3. FullerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Romanausky v. SkutulasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  2. ThorndikeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. AndersenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  4. LevineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API