Legal Opinion
People v. Cruz
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 14, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtStein, J.
Defendants were each charged by way of simplified traffic in-formations with violating the Vehicle and Traffic Law. After they pleaded not guilty, by mail, to the charges against them, the Justice Court of the Town of Ulster scheduled and notified each defendant of an appearance date for a pretrial conference/ trial.1 The People then issued and served subpoenas ad testificandum upon the various State Troopers responsible for issuing the simplified informations to secure their appearance on such dates. The State Police moved, on behalf of the individual troopers, to quash the subpoenas.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In re Terry D.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. FinleyNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Cunningham v. NadjariNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. MarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. GolstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Matter of People v. JuarezNew York Court of Appeals · 2018
- People v. LaughingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. LaughingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014