Legal Opinion
Dean v. Childs
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided May 13, 2004No. Docket No. 244627PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCooper, P.J.
Defendants Jeffrey Childs and the Charter Township of Royal Oak (the township) appeal by leave granted, following remand from our Supreme *51Court, the trial court’s order partially denying their motion for summary disposition.1 We affirm the trial court’s denial of Childs’s motion with regard to the state law claims, reverse the denial of the township’s motion with regard to the failure to train claim pursuant to 42 USC 1983, and remand for further proceedings.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On April 6, 2000, plaintiffs home in Royal Oak Township was set on fire, allegedly by an arsonist. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Robinson v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Geraldine Livermore, Personal Representative for the Estate of Roland E. Rohm, Deceased v. Daniel Lubelan and Jerry EllsworthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Beals v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
- Love v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Manuel v. GillMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Beals v. MichiganMichigan Supreme Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.