Legal Opinion
United States v. L-3 Communications EOTech, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 3, 2017No. 15-cv-9262 (RJS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge:
On November 24, 2015, the United States of America (the “government”) commenced this action against Defendants L-3 Communications EOTech, Inc. (“EO-Tech”), L-3 Communications Corporation (“L-3”), and Paul Mangano, to recover damages and civil penalties arising out of a scheme to defraud various government agencies in connection with EOTech’s sale of defective holographic weapon sights. (See Doc. No. 1.) On November 25, 2015, one day after the complaint was filed, the parties filed a stipulation of settlement and dismissal, pursuant to which…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Roberts v. Sea-Land Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States Ex Rel. Ladas v. Exelis, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
- Richard L. Sandstrom, Etc. v. Chemlawn CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. L-3 Communications EOTech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
- New York ex rel. Khurana v. Spherion Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2017