Legal Opinion
Maxy Mediansyah Mingkid v. U.S. Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 26, 2006No. 05-14484PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIRCH, Circuit Judge:
Maxy Meidiansyah Mingkid (“M.axy”) and Sumantri Apriliansyah Mingkid (“Su-mantri”) petition us for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s (“BIA”) final order (1) affirming the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying their applications for asylum and withholding of removal and (2) finding that their applications for asylum were frivolous. This case presents two issues of first impression in our circuit. First, whether the IJ may make a frivolity finding notwithstanding a determination that the asylum application is time-barred. Second, whether we have independent…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jamal Ali Farah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Mazen Al Najjar v. John AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Efe v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City Of AlabasterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Yuanliang Liu v. U.S. Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Smith v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Y-LBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
- Kansas Judicial Review v. StoutCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Ahir v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Alboniga v. School Board of Broward County FloridaDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2015
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.