Legal Opinion
Y-L
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2007No. ID 3563PublishedCited by 120 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
24 I&N Dec. 151
(BIA 2007) Interim Decision #3563 In re Y-L-, Respondent Decided April 25, 2007 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals (1) In determining that an application for asylum is frivolous, the Immigration Judge must address the question of frivolousness separately and make specific findings that the applicant deliberately fabricated material elements of the asylum claim. (2) Before the Immigration Judge makes a finding that an asylum application is frivolous, the applicant must be given sufficient opportunity to account…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Jamal Ali Farah v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- LOZADABoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
- Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Xian Tuan Ye v. Department of Homeland Security, Alberto R. Gonzales, U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by120 opinions
- Biao Yang v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Mei Chai Ye v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Dhital v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Putu Indrawati v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
- Ahir v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.