Legal Opinion

Loeb v. Webster

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 26, 1925No. 6 Div. 260PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

This appeal is from a judgment recovered by appellee against appellant in an action for slander. The cause was-tried upon the general issue joined on count four; all other counts having been stricken by plaintiff. This count appears in the report of the ease.

The words charged to have been used by defendant were not such as capable of an innocent meaning. They clearly charge a crime, 'an attempt to procure money under false pretense, and were actionable ^er se. An innuendo was therefore unnecessary, and the demurrer was properly overruled. Berdeaux v. Davis, 58 Ala. 611; Penry v. Dozier, 161…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Moulton v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Tannehill v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  4. Penry v. DozierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Age-Herald Pub. Co. v. WatermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  2. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. McLemore v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API