Legal Opinion · Dissent

Redevelopment Authority v. Pulakos

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1581 C.D. 1973Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

Judge Rogers:

I respectfully dissent.

The Eminent Domain Code of 1964, Act of June 22, 1964, Spec. Sess. P.L. 84, as amended, 26 P.S. §1-101 et seq. (Supp. 1974-1975) still declares just compensation to be the difference between the fair market value of the entire property interest immediately before and immediately after the condemnation.

While Section 705(2) (iv), 26 P.S. §1-705(2) (iv) permits a qualified valuation expert to testify as to his opinion of the value of the land together with the cost of replacing or reproducing the existing improvements thereon, less…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Werner v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Thompson v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Tross v. Johnstown Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API