Legal Opinion
Nedlloyd Lines B v. v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided August 31, 1992No. Docket Nos. S015917, S019540PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
3 Cal.4th 459 (1992)
834 P.2d 1148
11 Cal. Rptr.2d 330
NEDLLOYD LINES B.V. et al., Petitioners,
v.
THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, Respondent; SEAWINDS LIMITED, Real Party in Interest.
Docket Nos. S015917, S019540.
Supreme Court of California.
August 31, 1992.
COUNSEL
Walsh, Donovan, Lindh & Keech, Charles S. Donovan, Ann S. Crownover and Elizabeth M. Miller for Petitioners.
No appearance for Respondent.
Furth, Fahrner & Mason, Thomas R. Fahrner, Michele C. Jackson and Michael R. Hudson for Real Party in Interest.
OPINION
BAXTER, J.
We granted review to consider the effect of a choice-of-law clause…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
- Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Pnc Bank v. Richard SterbaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Yan Guo v. Kyani, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Caitlin Ahearn v. Hyundai Motor AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Sanchez v. Valencia Holding Co.California Supreme Court · 2015