Legal Opinion
Carol v. Roth v. Koppers Industries, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 24, 1993No. 92-3379PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SLOVITER, Chief Judge.
In this case, we must determine whether the findings of the Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Review (the Board), when unreviewed by a Pennsylvania court, may be afforded collateral estoppel effect in a subsequent action brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (1988 & Supp. Ill 1992). Following the clear teachings of Uni versity of Tennessee v. Elliott, 478 U.S. 788, 106 S.Ct. 3220, 92 L.Ed.2d 635 (1986), we hold that such findings may not be given issue preclusive effect in a subsequent Title…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Andrews v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- University of Tennessee v. ElliottSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chandler v. RoudebushSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Caver v. City of TrentonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- unempl.ins.rep. Cch 22,077 Harry T. Edmundson v. Borough of Kennett Square Robert F. Goddu Kenneth Roberts Herbert L. Waltz Albert J. McCarthyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Swineford v. Snyder County PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Bishop v. City of Birmingham Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Vandeventer v. Wabash National Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.