Legal Opinion

Schwartz v. Romnes

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 26, 1973No. 72 Civ. 3196PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

The plaintiff moves as a shareholder of American Telephone and Telegraph Company (ATT) to compel the return of $50,000.00 which New York Telephone Company (N.Y. Telephone), a wholly-owned subsidiary of ATT, contributed to “Yes for Transportation” (YFT), a not-for-profit corporation. It is admitted that the $50,000.00 was “intended for use and was used by said corporation in effectuating the corporate purpose of Yes for Transportation . . . which included support for the approval of the transportation bond issue which ap peared as a proposition on the election ballot on…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Congress of Industrial OrganizationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Smith v. HiginbothomCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  3. Bath Gas Light Co. v. . ClaffyNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. Abrams v. AllenNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  5. State v. Terre Haute Brewing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stallworth v. AmSouth Bank of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Zimmerman v. BellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
  3. Stallworth v. AmSouth Bank of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API