Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Hamilton

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 10, 1951No. Civ. 14634PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOTTKY, J. pro tem.

This is an appeal from an order modifying an interlocutory decree of divorce by changing the custody of a minor daughter, Michelle, 9 years old, from the mother to the father.

Appellant mother was awarded an interlocutory from respondent father in 1943, which decree approved and made a part of the decree the property settlement previously reached between the parties. The court made no finding as to the fitness of either parent to have the custody of the child, then 2% years old, and did not, in the decree proper, make an award of the custody of the child. The property…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Foster v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Prouty v. ProutyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Munson v. MunsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Roche v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Taber v. TaberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Fine v. DennyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Harris v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Frazier v. FrazierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Clayton v. ClaytonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API