United States v. John Ruppel
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
John Ruppel was convicted in May 1980 of conspiring to violate the drug laws and of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 846 (1976 & Supp.1981). Among the eight claims asserted in Ruppel’s direct appeal was that of prosecutorial vindictiveness. Ruppel argued that the Government violated due process when it reindicted him to bring the conspiracy and substantive drug charges after an earlier RICO indictment resulted in a mistrial because the jury was unable to reach a verdict. We affirmed Ruppel’s conviction. 666 F.2d 261 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 458 U.S. 1107,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Clayborne Jamison, Jr., United States of America v. Clayborne Jamison, Sr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Jerry WhaleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Jan Dil KhanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Alfonso MaysCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Woodson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Raetzsch v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.