Legal Opinion

Steinberg v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 2, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2009-1299PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 2004 the District of Columbia Office of Employee Appeals (OEA) ordered the District of Columbia Fire and Emergency Medical Services Agency (FEMS) to reinstate plaintiff Steve Steinberg as an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) and award him back pay. For eight years the agency did neither. Mr. Steinberg filed this suit alleging violations of his substantive and procedural due process rights. Now pending before the Court is defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Upon review of defendants’ motion, Mr. Steinberg’s opposition,…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rudder v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Dl v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  3. Lihong Xia v. KerryDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  4. Ryan v. Dist. of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  5. Steinberg v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API