Legal Opinion
Nah v. Sls
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 11, 2000No. 99SC90Published
1Opinion of the Court
9 P.3d 354 (2000)
N.A.H. and A.H., Petitioners,
v.
S.L.S., Respondent.
No. 99SC90.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
September 11, 2000.
Law Office of David M. Herrera, David M. Herrera, Fort Collins, Colorado, Law Office of Cris de la Torre, Cris de la Torre, Fort Collins, Colorado, Attorneys for Petitioners.
Mark K. Workman, Fort Collins, Colorado, Attorney for Respondent.
Carole Deeny Carnahan, Guardian Ad Litem, Fort Collins, Colorado.
Justice KOURLIS delivered the Opinion of the Court.
This case concerns the interpretation of Colorado's Uniform Parentage Act (the UPA), and causes us to determine…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- McDaniels v. CarlsonWashington Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Marriage of RossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- R.Mcg. v. J.W.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- People v. in the Interest of D.F.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.