Legal Opinion

State v. Mitchell

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 25, 1987No. 10-85-01355; CA A37813PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for assault in the second degree. ORS 163.175. He contends that the court erred in allowing the state to impeach two of its own witnesses and in not granting a mistrial because of impermissible argument to the jury by the prosecutor. He also contends that he was entitled to a jury determination of facts that the court used to impose an enhanced sentence under ORS 161.725.

We conclude that the court did not err in permitting the state to impeach its witnesses or in denying defendant’s motion for mistrial. We address only the claim regarding sentencing.

Defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. WedgeOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Roger Matthew Walters v. Manfred Maass, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  2. Roger Matthew Walters v. Manfred Maass, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. State v. CrainCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. LovelaceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
  5. Roger Matthew Walters v. Manfred Maass, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API