Searcy v. Kay
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
PREWETT, P. J., pro tem.
This is an application for a writ of mandate directing the defendant, as said clerk, to transmit to the clerk of the superior court of the city and county of San Francisco the files in an action for divorce commenced by plaintiff against one C. L. Searcy, the material events of which occurred in the following order:
1. September 19, 1919, action commenced in the superior court of said city and county.
2. October 10, 1919, place of trial changed to the superior court of the county of Humboldt on motion of the defendant.
3. After answer and on January 9, 1920, the place of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Chase v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
3Cited by3 opinions
- Badella v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Refrigeration Discount Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Badella v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955