Legal Opinion
United States v. Gary Pinalto
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 27, 1985No. 84-2247PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.
This appeal by the government under 18 U.S.C. § 3731 presents the question of whether certain conversations and tapes which the government intended to offer in the trial of the defendant, Pinalto, are admissible in evidence. We reverse.
On April 4, 1984, the Grand Jury indicted defendant-appellee Pinalto and Orsack. On May 2, 1984, a superseding indictment was filed. It was based on various crimes arising out of the expenditure of public funds to improve school facilities. Pinalto was charged with eighteen counts of mail fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1341, and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hoffa v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. PetersenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Arthur Eugene ShepherdCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Edwin Lee Roberts and Joseph FreemanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Terry Don LeachCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Garcia-RosaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Wolfgang v. Mid-America Motorsports, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Grace United Methodist Church v. City of CheyenneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Grace United Methodist Church v. City Of CheyenneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Gross v. Burggraf Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.